Site menu

Search by ticker code:
Generic filters

Menu

Search by ticker code:
Generic filters

Search by ticker code:
Generic filters

Was the Betmakers (ASX:BET) sell-off justified?

Betmakers Technology Group Ltd (ASX: BET) shares were the second most traded on the ASX last week.

It appears some investors believe its shares have been oversold following its $4 billion acquisition proposal for the wagering arm of Tabcorp Holdings Limited (ASX: TAH).

After tumbling over 60% to 99 cents each on the proposal, Betmakers shares have quickly rebounded around 20% to the current share price of $1.18 at the time of writing.

BET share price

Source: Rask Media BET 1-year share price chart

Why were Betmakers shares sold off?

There could be a number of reasons why the market reacted negatively to the acquisition proposal. But I think it’s most likely that it’s because Tabcorp’s wagering business isn’t being seen as an extremely attractive asset to potentially acquire.

While Tabcorp’s lotteries division has been the primary source of revenue in recent years, its wagering arm was underperforming even prior to COVID-19.

A large component of the wagering business is its TAB retail outlets, which generated around 45% of the division’s revenue pre-COVID.

While TAB does have an online offering, it struggled to migrate its customers over when COVID-19 caused venues to close their doors. Growth in online bookmakers such as Ladbrokes and Sportsbet seemed to have outpaced that of TAB by a significant margin.

To make matters worse, there’s been a recent shift away from tote betting towards fixed odds bets. In tote betting, money from customers is pooled and the odds are based on the bets that have been placed.

While this has been popular in the past, there’s been a significant drop in the value of tote bets placed over the past year, which has contributed to the underperformance of Tabcorp’s wagering business.

Concluding thoughts

There’s no sure way of knowing, but I don’t think the Tabcorp board will approve the acquisition proposal.

The current bidding war could suggest that higher offers might possibly be put forward that are on better terms. As my colleague, Lachlan Buur-Jensen noted in his recent article, an all-cash bid seems more attractive than one that comprises of Betmakers shares.

Not only would the valuation around its shares be complicated, but there’d be the ongoing battle to turn around the underperforming division.

Acquisition aside, it might also be worth considering Betmakers’ valuation as part of the research process. With a market cap of just under $1 million, it does seem to imply a certain blue sky scenario that might or might not eventuate.

For some more share ideas, I’d recommend signing up for a free Rask account and accessing our full stock reports. Click this link to join for free and access our analyst reports.

$50,000 per year in passive income from shares? Yes, please!

With interest rates UP, now could be one of the best times to start earning passive income from a portfolio. Imagine earning 4%, 5% — or more — in dividend passive income from the best shares, LICs, or ETFs… it’s like magic.

So how do the best investors do it?

Chief Investment Officer Owen Rask has just released his brand new passive income report. Owen has outlined 10 of his favourite ETFs and shares to watch, his rules for passive income investing, why he would buy ETFs before LICs and more.

You can INSTANTLY access Owen’s report for FREE by CLICKING HERE NOW and creating a 100% FREE Rask Account.

(Psst. By creating a free Rask account, you’ll also get access to 15+ online courses, 1,000+ podcasts, invites to events, a weekly value investing newsletter and more!)

Unsubscribe anytime. Read our TermsFinancial Services GuidePrivacy Policy. We’ll never sell your email address. Our company is Australian owned.

Information warning: The information on this website is published by The Rask Group Pty Ltd (ABN: 36 622 810 995) is limited to factual information or (at most) general financial advice only. That means, the information and advice does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not specific to you, your needs, goals or objectives. Because of that, you should consider if the advice is appropriate to you and your needs, before acting on the information. If you don’t know what your needs are, you should consult a trusted and licensed financial adviser who can provide you with personal financial product advice. In addition, you should obtain and read the product disclosure statement (PDS) before making a decision to acquire a financial product. Please read our Terms and Conditions and Financial Services Guide before using this website. The Rask Group Pty Ltd is a Corporate Authorised Representative (#1280930) of AFSL #383169.

At the time of publishing, the author of this article does not have a financial or commercial interest in any of the companies mentioned.
Skip to content