Site menu

Search by ticker code:
Generic filters

Menu

Search by ticker code:
Generic filters

Search by ticker code:
Generic filters

A decision just cost QBE (ASX:QBE) shareholders $70 million

QBE Insurance Group Ltd (ASX: QBE) announced this morning that a decision in the UK is expected to cost $70 million.

QBE’s UK news

QBE said that the High Court of England and Wales yesterday handed down its decision in the test case commenced by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in June 2020. The FCA is similar to Australia’s regulator ASIC.

The FCA took on the test case to resolve legal issues about the interpretation of common business interruption policy wordings, including some policy wordings of QBE’s UK operations, in the context of whether those policy wordings respond to COVID-19 and related government mandated nationwide lockdowns.

The UK court ruled in favour of QBE in two of out of three notifiable disease policy wordings examined and in favour of insurers generally in regards to denial of access policy wordings.

However, the court ruled in favour of insureds (meaning, against QBE) for one policy wordings and QBE is considering its options to appeal that decision.

Based on the notified claims affected and individual policy sub-limits, QBE estimates its UK business interruption claims exposure is around $170 million before allowing for recoveries under its catastrophe reinsurance protections.

QBE believes the catastrophe reinsurance will limit the net cost claims to $70 million which formed part of the $335 million net cost of COVID-19 in its recent FY20 half year result.

The insurer said this test case in complex and it will take time for the industry to fully consider and for claims to be resolved. All parties now have an opportunity to apply to appeal some or all of the ruling. A decision on applications will be made in October. QBE doesn’t expect the net cost to vary.

Summary

QBE was expecting something like this. However, I’m not a fan of insurers, their profit is regularly hit. I prefer consistent ASX dividend shares like Washington H. Soul Pattinson and Co. Ltd (ASX: SOL).

$50,000 per year in passive income from shares? Yes, please!

With interest rates UP, now could be one of the best times to start earning passive income from a portfolio. Imagine earning 4%, 5% — or more — in dividend passive income from the best shares, LICs, or ETFs… it’s like magic.

So how do the best investors do it?

Chief Investment Officer Owen Rask has just released his brand new passive income report. Owen has outlined 10 of his favourite ETFs and shares to watch, his rules for passive income investing, why he would buy ETFs before LICs and more.

You can INSTANTLY access Owen’s report for FREE by CLICKING HERE NOW and creating a 100% FREE Rask Account.

(Psst. By creating a free Rask account, you’ll also get access to 15+ online courses, 1,000+ podcasts, invites to events, a weekly value investing newsletter and more!)

Unsubscribe anytime. Read our TermsFinancial Services GuidePrivacy Policy. We’ll never sell your email address. Our company is Australian owned.

Information warning: The information on this website is published by The Rask Group Pty Ltd (ABN: 36 622 810 995) is limited to factual information or (at most) general financial advice only. That means, the information and advice does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not specific to you, your needs, goals or objectives. Because of that, you should consider if the advice is appropriate to you and your needs, before acting on the information. If you don’t know what your needs are, you should consult a trusted and licensed financial adviser who can provide you with personal financial product advice. In addition, you should obtain and read the product disclosure statement (PDS) before making a decision to acquire a financial product. Please read our Terms and Conditions and Financial Services Guide before using this website. The Rask Group Pty Ltd is a Corporate Authorised Representative (#1280930) of AFSL #383169.

At the time of publishing, the author of this article does not have a financial or commercial interest in any of the companies mentioned.
Skip to content