Site menu

Search by ticker code:
Generic filters

Menu

Search by ticker code:
Generic filters

Search by ticker code:
Generic filters

What tougher regulation could mean for BNPL shares… Will Zip (ASX:Z1P) and Afterpay (ASX:APT) survive?

Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ASX: CBA) CEO Matt Comyn has recently appeared before a parliamentary committee and argued that it’s time for regulators to step in and align buy-now-pay-later companies with traditional credit products that are subject to strict credit reporting regimes.

Comyn has said buy-now-pay-later (BNPL) products should also be held to a similar standard and merchants should be allowed to pass on service fees to their customers.

Here’s how the latter might affect some ASX BNPL shares.

Afterpay share price

Source: Rask Media APT 1-year share price chart

Merchant fees

For any given purchase that uses a BNPL platform such as Afterpay Ltd (ASX: APT) or Zip Co Ltd (ASX: Z1P), the merchant typically gets charged around 4-5% of the transaction amount. This is significantly higher than other forms of payment such as debit and credit cards, which are usually between 1-2%.

The current regulation around this means merchants aren’t allowed to surcharge this merchant fee, i.e., Increase the transaction amount by 4-5% to cover this cost.

Instead, one of the only other ways merchants can recoup this cost is to increase the price of all goods and services store-wide, which will therefore indirectly cover the cost of the merchant fee.

The problem with this is that customers who aren’t paying through BNPL are essentially subsidising those who are and will pay more than they usually would for their purchase.

Those against allowing BNPL surcharges would commonly argue that businesses generate a higher volume of sales through BNPL’s lead generation capabilities.

This is probably true, but card schemes such as Visa Inc (NYSE: V) and Mastercard Inc (NYSE: MA) also attract customers as a secure payment network, but these costs are allowed to be passed on to customers in the form of a surcharge. In this regard, I don’t see why merchants shouldn’t be allowed to surcharge as well rather than coughing up the service fee themselves.

My guess is that BNPL providers are against surcharging because it’s a real possibility that fewer customers would choose to purchase through these forms of payment if the cost was passed onto them.

According to a 2019 consumer survey cited by the RBA, around 50% of respondents said they’d use a different payment method if a surcharge was imposed, 10% would cancel the purchase, and 40% would be happy to pay the surcharge.

Summary

While BNPL is often considered extremely low-cost due to charging no interest, the reality is that someone or some business has to end up paying for it.

The current regulation in favour of BNPL companies passes the cost onto merchants, which has been a boon for many BNPL valuations up until now, but I’m not so sure if it can last forever.

For more reading, I’d suggest getting a free Rask account and accessing our full stock reports. Click this link to join for free and access our analyst reports.

$50,000 per year in passive income from shares? Yes, please!

With interest rates UP, now could be one of the best times to start earning passive income from a portfolio. Imagine earning 4%, 5% — or more — in dividend passive income from the best shares, LICs, or ETFs… it’s like magic.

So how do the best investors do it?

Chief Investment Officer Owen Rask has just released his brand new passive income report. Owen has outlined 10 of his favourite ETFs and shares to watch, his rules for passive income investing, why he would buy ETFs before LICs and more.

You can INSTANTLY access Owen’s report for FREE by CLICKING HERE NOW and creating a 100% FREE Rask Account.

(Psst. By creating a free Rask account, you’ll also get access to 15+ online courses, 1,000+ podcasts, invites to events, a weekly value investing newsletter and more!)

Unsubscribe anytime. Read our TermsFinancial Services GuidePrivacy Policy. We’ll never sell your email address. Our company is Australian owned.

Information warning: The information on this website is published by The Rask Group Pty Ltd (ABN: 36 622 810 995) is limited to factual information or (at most) general financial advice only. That means, the information and advice does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not specific to you, your needs, goals or objectives. Because of that, you should consider if the advice is appropriate to you and your needs, before acting on the information. If you don’t know what your needs are, you should consult a trusted and licensed financial adviser who can provide you with personal financial product advice. In addition, you should obtain and read the product disclosure statement (PDS) before making a decision to acquire a financial product. Please read our Terms and Conditions and Financial Services Guide before using this website. The Rask Group Pty Ltd is a Corporate Authorised Representative (#1280930) of AFSL #383169.

At the time of publishing, the author of this article does not have a financial or commercial interest in any of the companies mentioned.
Skip to content